🔗 Share this article

Do your professional networking connections recognizing you as a industry expert? Are hordes of commenters applauding your advice on expanding your business? Are headhunters making contact to discuss collaborations?

If not, the explanation could be your gender.

The Experiment: Modifying Profile Gender for Better Visibility

Numerous female professionals joined a collective professional network test recently following popular discussions suggested that changing their profile gender to "man" boosted their network presence.

Other testers modified their professional summaries to include what they termed "bro-coded" language - adding results-driven business buzzwords like "drive", "revolutionize" and "expedite". Anecdotally, their exposure also improved.

Systemic Preference Questions Raised

The engagement increase has caused some to wonder whether an inherent sexism in LinkedIn's algorithm favors male users who use online business jargon.

Similar to many large social media platforms, LinkedIn employs an algorithm to determine which content appear to which users - boosting some while suppressing others.

Platform Response

Through a company announcement, LinkedIn recognized the trend but stated it does not factor in "demographic information" when deciding content distribution. Rather, the company mentioned that "hundreds of signals" affect how posts perform.

Modifying profile gender in your settings does not affect how your content shows up in results or timelines.

Personal Experiences

Simone Bonnett, who changed her pronouns to "he/him" and her name to "Simon E", reported extraordinary outcomes.

"The numbers I'm observing show a 1,600% increase in profile views and a 1,300% increase in content views," she commented.

Another professional, a communications strategist, began experimenting after noticing her audience decline significantly.

The Process

• First, she changed her gender to "male"
• Then, she used artificial intelligence to rewrite her profile using "masculine-oriented" wording
• Lastly, she repurposed old posts with comparable "assertive" style

The outcome was immediate: a 415% increase in visibility within one week.

The Downside

Although the success, Cornish expressed dissatisfaction with the method.

"Previously, my content were more personal - brief and insightful, but also warm and relatable," she explained. "Now, the bro-coded version was forceful and confident - similar to a white male being overly confident."

She abandoned the experiment after one week, saying "Each day I continued, and results improved, I became angrier."

Varying Outcomes

Not all participants encountered positive results. One writer who modified both her profile gender to "man" and her ethnicity to "Caucasian" reported a reduction in reach and engagement.

"We understand there's algorithmic bias, but it's extremely difficult to comprehend how it operates in particular situations or why," she commented.

Broader Implications

These tests occur alongside continuing conversations about LinkedIn's unique position as both a business platform and social space.

Platform modifications in recent months have apparently caused female creators experiencing significantly reduced exposure, resulting in unofficial tests where identical posts by men and women received dramatically unequal audience engagement.

System Details

Per LinkedIn, the platform uses artificial intelligence to categorize and distribute posts based on multiple factors, including post content and the member's career profile.

The company states it frequently assesses its algorithms, including "examinations of inequalities based on gender."

Company representative proposed that current reductions in some users' reach might originate from higher volume due to additional posts on the network.

Changing Landscape

According to a tester noted, "bro-coding" appears to be increasing on the platform.

"People often view LinkedIn as more businesslike and refined," she remarked. "This is evolving. It's becoming increasingly competitive and unpredictable."